Robinson v. State
137 So. 3d 1169, 2014 WL 1393102, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5236
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 2014·No. No. 3D12-3385·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Devin Robinson appeals an order finding that he violated his probation and imposing a prison sentence. We affirm the violation of probation. However, the affir-mance is without prejudice to the defendant filing an appropriate Rule 3.800 motion to correct the written sentence. The record demonstrates that defense counsel did bring the correct credit time to the court’s attention, and the court orally awarded the proper credit. The written order does not reflect this award.
Affirmed without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. State, 137 So. 3d 1169, 2014 WL 1393102, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5236 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
137 So. 3d 1169 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. State
176 So. 3d 357 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)