Robinson v. State
67 So. 3d 319, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8956, 2011 WL 2342509
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 984 So. 2d 1281 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Rosa v. State, 58 So.3d 900, 902 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (declining to apply merger rule as set forth in Brooks v. State, 918 So.2d 181 (Fla.2005), because the evidence showed that the child victim suffered several acts of violence); Dorsey v. State, 942 So.2d 983, 985 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (holding that Brooks did not apply because the evidence suggested the child had suffered multiple acts of abuse during the eight-hour period he was with the defendant).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. State, 67 So. 3d 319, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8956, 2011 WL 2342509 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
67 So. 3d 319 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brooks v. State
918 So. 2d 181 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Dorsey v. State
942 So. 2d 983 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Rosa v. State
58 So. 3d 900 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)