Robinson v. State

11 So. 3d 466, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9337, 2009 WL 1708948
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 936 So. 2d 1164
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 2009·No. 5D09-1455·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted. The trial court’s failure to rule upon Petitioner’s motion to disqualify within 30 days of its service resulted in the motion being deemed granted by rule. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(j) (“If not ruled on within 30 days of service, the motion [to disqualify] shall be deemed granted and the moving party may seek an order from the court directing the clerk to reassign the case.”). Petitioner is entitled to the reassignment of his case to a different judge, which, at this point, constitutes nothing more than a ministerial duty of the lower court. See Schisler v. State, 958 So.2d 503 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); see also Berube v. State, 978 So.2d 893 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (reversing denial of rule 3.850 motion; trial court had no authority to hear motion because appellant’s prior motion to disqualify had been deemed granted by trial court’s failure to timely rule upon same). Accordingly, the matter is remanded to the lower court with instruction to reassign the case to a different judge.

PETITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA, MONACO and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 11 So. 3d 466, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9337, 2009 WL 1708948 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

11 So. 3d 466 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Berube v. State
978 So. 2d 893 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Schisler v. State
958 So. 2d 503 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)