Robinson v. State
943 So. 2d 868, 2006 WL 3299524
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 881 So. 2d 29 →
Opinion
Willie ROBINSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Willie Robinson, Florida City, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Appellant's motion for postconviction relief was untimely and successive. In addition, his claim based upon Roberts v. State, 874 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), rev. denied sub nom. State v. West, 892 So.2d 1014 (Fla.2005), is also barred, as Roberts does not apply retroactively. See Ulcena v. State, 925 So.2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
WARNER, FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. State, 943 So. 2d 868, 2006 WL 3299524 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
943 So. 2d 868 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ulcena v. State
925 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Roberts v. State
874 So. 2d 1225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)