Robinson v. State
900 So. 2d 689, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5466, 2005 WL 906183
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 829 So. 2d 984 →
Opinion
We find appellant’s claim that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to strike Juror Cunningham to be legally sufficient. We reverse the trial court’s summary denial of relief, and remand for either an evi-dentiary hearing or attachments of portions of the record to refute appellant’s claim. Kitchen v. State, 764 So.2d 868 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Powell v. State, 673 So.2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. State, 900 So. 2d 689, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5466, 2005 WL 906183 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
900 So. 2d 689 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kitchen v. State
764 So. 2d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Powell v. State
673 So. 2d 119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)