Robinson v. State
Opinion
Appellant challenges her conviction and sentence for armed burglary. We find no error as to the conviction but determine that there was insufficient evidence that appellant was in possession of a firearm during the burglary to support imposition of the mandatory minimum sentence under section 775.087, Florida Statutes (2007). See Bolden v. State, 4 So.3d 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment but reverse the imposition of the mandatory minimum sentence and remand to the trial court for resentencing.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
16 So. 3d 229 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.