Robinson v. State

417 So. 2d 321, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28859
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 388 So. 2d 286
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 28, 1982·No. No. 81-1821·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review the only error we find involves the failure of the trial court to make specific findings of fact regarding the necessity to retain jurisdiction over the first third of appellant’s sentence for purposes of parole review. Section 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981); Mobley v. State, 409 So.2d 1031 (Fla.1982).

Accordingly, appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed but this cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to either strike the provision retaining jurisdiction or to enter an order setting out those findings of fact required by Section 947.16(3)(a).

ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM G, Jr. (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 417 So. 2d 321, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28859 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

417 So. 2d 321 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mobley v. State
409 So. 2d 1031 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)