Robinson v. State

417 So. 2d 321, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28859
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 28, 1982
DocketNo. 81-1821
StatusPublished

This text of 417 So. 2d 321 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. State, 417 So. 2d 321, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28859 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review the only error we find involves the failure of the trial court to make specific findings of fact regarding the necessity to retain jurisdiction over the first third of appellant’s sentence for purposes of parole review. Section 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981); Mobley v. State, 409 So.2d 1031 (Fla.1982).

Accordingly, appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed but this cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to either strike the provision retaining jurisdiction or to enter an order setting out those findings of fact required by Section 947.16(3)(a).

ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM G, Jr. (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mobley v. State
409 So. 2d 1031 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
417 So. 2d 321, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.