Robinson v. State
This text of 417 So. 2d 321 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon review the only error we find involves the failure of the trial court to make specific findings of fact regarding the necessity to retain jurisdiction over the first third of appellant’s sentence for purposes of parole review. Section 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981); Mobley v. State, 409 So.2d 1031 (Fla.1982).
Accordingly, appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed but this cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to either strike the provision retaining jurisdiction or to enter an order setting out those findings of fact required by Section 947.16(3)(a).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
417 So. 2d 321, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.