Robinson v. Robinson

88 So. 3d 973, 2012 WL 1440435, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6628
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 2012
DocketNo. 5D10-2645
StatusPublished

This text of 88 So. 3d 973 (Robinson v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Robinson, 88 So. 3d 973, 2012 WL 1440435, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6628 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

EVANDER, J.

Janet Robinson appeals from a Second Final Judgment of Dissolution of Mar[974]*974riage. We address two issues. First, as conceded by the former husband, a mathematical error resulted in the former husband receiving $67,840 more net assets than the former wife. On remand, the trial court shall correct this discrepancy.

Second, as again conceded by the former husband, he violated this court’s stay order.1 The stay order violations consisted of: (1) the former husband’s sale of certain real property to his sister, and (2) the former husband’s receipt of proceeds derived from the sale of real property by Prestige Construction and Development, LLC (an entity in which both parties had a legal interest). Although the former husband remedied much of the damages that might have otherwise resulted from his violations of the stay order, we conclude that the former wife is entitled to recover her reasonable attorney’s fees for the time expended, both at the trial and appellate court levels, in litigating the issues related to the former husband’s violations. On remand, the trial court shall determine such amount.

We affirm as to the other issues raised on appeal.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.

MONACO and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Oath of Admission to the Florida Bar
73 So. 3d 149 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 So. 3d 973, 2012 WL 1440435, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-robinson-fladistctapp-2012.