Robinson v. Robinson
This text of 82 So. 3d 893 (Robinson v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James F. Robinson, former husband, timely appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. While Robinson challenges the judgment on a number of grounds, we find merit in only his challenge to the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to the former wife and write solely to address this issue.
The touchstone for the award of attorney’s fees is need and ability to pay. See § 61.16, Fla. Stat.; Von Baillou v. Von Baillou, 959 So.2d 821, 823 (Fla. 4th DCA *894 2007). While we leave undisturbed the trial court’s determination that former husband had the ability to pay former wife’s fees, the record before this court fails to demonstrate that former wife had the “need” for the $13,683.42 fee award.
The evidence at the hearing established that former wife had incurred $13,683.42 in fees and costs for time and expenditures prior to the hearing and another $6,627.50 for the one-day hearing — a total of $20,310.92. It was undisputed that, during the pendency of the proceedings, former wife’s attorneys were paid $15,000 from the parties’ joint account. The final judgment did not address this $15,000 payment. It is clear, however, that if the total amount former wife owed her attorneys was $20,310.92 and her attorneys had already been paid $15,000, the most former wife would “need” is $5,310.92. We thus reverse the $13,683.42 fee award in favor of former wife and remand for further proceedings on this issue. The final judgment is affirmed in all other respects.
Affirmed in Part; Reversed in Part; and Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 So. 3d 893, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9621, 2011 WL 2462698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-robinson-fladistctapp-2011.