Robinson v. Morris Plan Co.
This text of 171 S.E. 394 (Robinson v. Morris Plan Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The taking and reserving of interest at the rate of 8 per cent, in advance, whether for a short-time or long-time loan, is usurious. Loganville Banking Co. v. Forrester, 143 Ga. 302 (84 S. E. 961, L. R. A. 1915D, 1195) ; Reese v. Bloodworth, 146 Ga. 355 (91 S. E. 120); Bank of Lumpkin County v. Justus, 150 Ga. 286 (103 S. E. 794) ; Haley v. Covington, 19 Ga. App. 782 (92 S. E. 297). The provisions of the Civil Code (1910), § 2878, with reference to building and loan associations, to apply, must be pleaded. The petition does not disclose that the plaintiff stands in any exceptional capacity. The plea of usury was good, and the court erred in striking it.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 S.E. 394, 47 Ga. App. 737, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-morris-plan-co-gactapp-1933.