Reese v. Bloodworth

91 S.E. 120, 146 Ga. 355, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 303
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 11, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 120 (Reese v. Bloodworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reese v. Bloodworth, 91 S.E. 120, 146 Ga. 355, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 303 (Ga. 1917).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. The reserving of interest in advance at the highest legal rate on a loan, whether it be a short or long-term loan, is usurious; and a deed to land, given, to secure a promissory note for the loan, is void on account of usury. Loganville Banking Co. v. Forrester, 143 Ga. 302 (84 S. E. 961, L. R. A. 1915D, 1195).

2. If money-is loaned for the purpose of enabling a borrower to buy a certain shop, upon an agreement that for the use of the money the lender shall receive from the borrower one half of the specified rents from the property, which amounts to more than the highest legal rate of interest per annum, the transaction will be usurious. Baggett v. Trulock, 77 Ga. 369 (3 S. E. 162); Floyd v. Kicklighter, 139 Ga. 133, 139 (76 S. E. 1011).

3. By the admissions in the plea and the uneontradieted testimony of the defendant, both the security deeds involved in this case were infected with usury and were void. Without passing upon the power of the . trustee to encumber the property, it was erroneous to refuse an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices eonour. Petition for injunction. Before Judge Park. Jones superior court. April 18, 1916. J. B. Jackson, A. L. Jackson, and L. D. Moore, for plaintiffs. E. T. Dumas and F. Holmes Johnson, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Norwood Realty Co.
93 S.E.2d 763 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
FIRST FEDERAL &C. ASSN. v. Norwood &C. Co.
93 S.E.2d 763 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Kent v. Hibernia Savings, Building & Loan Ass'n
10 S.E.2d 759 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. Marshall
175 S.E. 412 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Robinson v. Morris Plan Co.
171 S.E. 394 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Haley v. Covington
92 S.E. 297 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 120, 146 Ga. 355, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-bloodworth-ga-1917.