Robinson v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.
This text of 14 A. 860 (Robinson v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The cases cited 1 for the. defendant show that it is the practice at common law for the higher courts, when the plaintiff in a pending action has previously brought suit in the same forum for the same cause of action, and has been nonsuited on the merits, to stay proceedings until he has satisfied the judgment for costs recovered against him. Some cases hold that the stay will be granted when the nonsuit is voluntary.
The motion for a stay is granted, and also the motion for surety for costs, said surety to be given on or before the first day of the next term.
As follows:
Melchart v. Halsey, 3 Wilson, 149, and cases cited ; Gravenor v. Cape; Bass v. Firmen, 1 Ld. Raym. 697; Lord Biron’s case, 1 Vent. 100; Bridge v. Sumner, 1 Pick. 371; Cuyler v. Vanderwerk, 1 Johnson’s Cases, 247, and note c; Jackson v. Edwards, 1 Cow. 138 ; Jackson v. Carpenter, 3 Cow. 22 ; Perkins v. Hinman, 19 Johns. Rep. 237.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A. 860, 16 R.I. 217, 1888 R.I. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-merchants-miners-transportation-co-ri-1888.