Jackson ex dem. Livingston against Edwards

1 Cow. 138
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1823·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Curia.

It appeared, on the former trial, that Brown was tenant to all the lessors in this action, except Cornelia Livingston. The other lessors are the heirs at law of Philip Livingston. They are to be retained, and the trial of this causéis to be on the same title. Being in relation to the same title, and the same premises which were formerly recovered against the title of these very lessors, the change, by introducing the name of Cornelia Livingston, cannot render it an exception to the general rule, as laid down in the books of practice, that where the same title to the same premises is drawn in question in the second suit, between parties or privies to the first, the Court will order a payment of the costs of the first suit, before they will suffer the second to proceed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Livingston against Edwards, 1 Cow. 138 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

1 Cow. 138 (Jackson ex dem. Livingston against Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co. v. Glen Telephone Co.
121 F. 174 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1903)
Williams v. Getz
17 D.C. App. 388 (D.C. Circuit, 1901)
Ex parte Shear
92 Ala. 596 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Robinson v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.
14 A. 860 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1888)
Vetterlein v. Barnes
50 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 437 (New York Supreme Court, 1887)
Kitts v. Willson
89 Ind. 95 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)
Gerrish v. Pratt
6 Minn. 53 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1861)
Ten Broeck v. Reynolds
13 How. Pr. 462 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)