Robinson v. Kotler

S.D. New York

Robinson v. Kotler

DecidedFebruary 28, 2024

Docket1:23-cv-10623

StatusUnknown

This text of Robinson v. Kotler (Robinson v. Kotler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Kotler, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee eK GINA ROBINSON, Petitioner, 23 CIVIL 10623 (GHW) -against- JUDGMENT HON. LYNN R. KOTLER, Respondent. KX

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order of Dismissal dated February 28, 2024, Having dismissed Plaintiff's complaint, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is also denied as moot. In any case, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and its supporting materials, do not assert any substantively new argument or show any material fact in dispute that might change the Court's analysis as to whether Plaintiff has shown an entitlement to relief. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant, and the case is closed.

Dated: New York, New York February 28, 2024 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court

BY: ER Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee eK GINA ROBINSON, Petitioner, 23 CIVIL 10623 (GHW) -against- JUDGMENT HON. LYNN R. KOTLER, Respondent. KX

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order of Dismissal dated February 28, 2024, Having dismissed Plaintiff's complaint, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is also denied as moot. In any case, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and its supporting materials, do not assert any substantively new argument or show any material fact in dispute that might change the Court's analysis as to whether Plaintiff has shown an entitlement to relief. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant, and the case is closed.

Dated: New York, New York February 28, 2024 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court

BY: ER Deputy Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Robinson v. Kotler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-kotler-nysd-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack