Robinson v. Fincken
This text of 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 516 (Robinson v. Fincken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum.—It appears that the plaintiff’s exhibits Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, and defendant’s exhibits Nos. 1 and 2, are omitted from the return, which omission precludes any determination -as to the matters litigated at this time.
It is, therefore, directed that the appeal be reheard at the additional general term of this court to be held December 20, 1894, the return to. be amended in the particulars noted meanwhile. Krokomki v. North N. Y., etc., Asson., 54 St. Rep. 119.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 N.Y. St. Rep. 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-fincken-nyctcompl-1894.