Lamson Consolidated Store-Service Co. v. Conyuham
30 N.Y.S. 1132, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 516
Opinion
As plaintiff’s exhibit is not contained in the return, the appeal must be reheard at the additional general term of this court, to be held December 20, 1894; the return to be amended meanwhile by the addition of said exhibit. See Robinson v. Fincken (handed down herewith) 30 N. Y. Supp, 1134, mem.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lamson Consolidated Store-Service Co. v. Conyuham, 30 N.Y.S. 1132, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 516 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
30 N.Y.S. 1132 (Lamson Consolidated Store-Service Co. v. Conyuham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.