Lamson Consolidated Store-Service Co. v. Conyuham
63 N.Y. St. Rep. 872
This text of 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 872 (Lamson Consolidated Store-Service Co. v. Conyuham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lamson Consolidated Store-Service Co. v. Conyuham, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 872 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
Opinion
As plaintiff’s exhibit is not contained in the return, the appeal must be reheard at the additional general term of this court, to be held December 20, 1894; the return to be amended meanwhile by the addition of' said exhibit. See Robinson v. Fincken (handed down herewith), 30 N. Y. Supp. 1134, mem.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Robinson v. Fincken
30 N.Y.S. 1134 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
63 N.Y. St. Rep. 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamson-consolidated-store-service-co-v-conyuham-nyctcompl-1894.