Robinson v. Equifax
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1125
RENE ROBINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EQUIFAX; EXPERIAN; TRANSUNION, BOARD MEMBERS AND/ALL EMPLOYEE ET SEQ.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:10-cv-00084-BO)
Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rene Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Tasheika Hinson, JONES DAY, Atlanta, Georgia; Ginny E. Hawkinson, STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP, Frisco, Texas; Barry Goheen, KING & SPALDING, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Rene Robinson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint against Equifax, Experian, and
Transunion, for allegedly violating the Fair Credit Reporting
Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1681(u) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Experian,
No. 4:10-cv-00084-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. Equifax (Robinson v. Equifax) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.