Robinson v. Equifax

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2011·No. 11-1125·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1125

RENE ROBINSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

EQUIFAX; EXPERIAN; TRANSUNION, BOARD MEMBERS AND/ALL EMPLOYEE ET SEQ.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:10-cv-00084-BO)

Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rene Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Tasheika Hinson, JONES DAY, Atlanta, Georgia; Ginny E. Hawkinson, STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP, Frisco, Texas; Barry Goheen, KING & SPALDING, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rene Robinson appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her complaint against Equifax, Experian, and

Transunion, for allegedly violating the Fair Credit Reporting

Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1681(u) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Experian,

No. 4:10-cv-00084-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2011). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Equifax, (4th Cir. 2011).

Robinson v. Equifax (Robinson v. Equifax) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 1681-1681
15 U.S.C. § 1681-1681(u)
§ 1681
15 U.S.C. § 1681