Robinson v. Equifax
This text of Robinson v. Equifax (Robinson v. Equifax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1125
RENE ROBINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EQUIFAX; EXPERIAN; TRANSUNION, BOARD MEMBERS AND/ALL EMPLOYEE ET SEQ.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:10-cv-00084-BO)
Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rene Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Tasheika Hinson, JONES DAY, Atlanta, Georgia; Ginny E. Hawkinson, STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP, Frisco, Texas; Barry Goheen, KING & SPALDING, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Rene Robinson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint against Equifax, Experian, and
Transunion, for allegedly violating the Fair Credit Reporting
Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1681(u) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Experian,
No. 4:10-cv-00084-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robinson v. Equifax, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-equifax-ca4-2011.