Robinson v. County of Broome
This text of 93 N.E.2d 77 (Robinson v. County of Broome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clifford L. Robinson et al., Appellants,
v.
County of Broome et al., Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
C. Addison Keeler for appellants.
George R. Fearon and Robert J. Feinberg for Town of Union, respondent.
Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Wendell P. Brown and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), appearing, pursuant to section 68 of the Executive Law, in support of the constitutionality of section 75-a of the Social Welfare Law.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 N.E.2d 77, 301 N.Y. 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-county-of-broome-ny-1950.