Robinson v. Bulkly

5 Rawle 227, 1835 Pa. LEXIS 35
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 16, 1835·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

According to.the principle of Frantz v. Kaser, 3 Serg. & Rawle, 395, and Ebersoll v. Krug, 3 Binney, 528, the writ issued improvidently. It would have been well enough, had it been delivered after the period for an appeal had elapsed; but it was delivered on the eighteenth day, and it therefore cannot be sustained.

Writ of error .quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Bulkly, 5 Rawle 227, 1835 Pa. LEXIS 35 (Pa. 1835).

5 Rawle 227 (Robinson v. Bulkly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sturdevant v. Wildoner
22 Pa. D. & C. 85 (Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 1934)