Robinson v. Bulkly

5 Rawle 227, 1835 Pa. LEXIS 35
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 16, 1835
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Rawle 227 (Robinson v. Bulkly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Bulkly, 5 Rawle 227, 1835 Pa. LEXIS 35 (Pa. 1835).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

According to.the principle of Frantz v. Kaser, 3 Serg. & Rawle, 395, and Ebersoll v. Krug, 3 Binney, 528, the writ issued improvidently. It would have been well enough, had it been delivered after the period for an appeal had elapsed; but it was delivered on the eighteenth day, and it therefore cannot be sustained.

Writ of error .quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sturdevant v. Wildoner
22 Pa. D. & C. 85 (Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Rawle 227, 1835 Pa. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-bulkly-pa-1835.