Frantz v. Kaser

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Frantz v. Kaser

3 Serg. & Rawle 395

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 15, 1817

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 Serg. & Rawle 395 (Frantz v. Kaser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frantz v. Kaser, 3 Serg. & Rawle 395 (Pa. 1817).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The time when the writ of error issued from the office of the prothonotary of the Supreme Court is immaterial, because it has no effect till delivered to the prothonotary of the Common Pleas; therefore, there is no weight in the first objection. As to the second, the rule is, that you must exclude either, the day of the report being filed, or the day of the writ of error being filed, in the Court below. Consequently, the 20 days allowed for the appeal had elapsed ®n the 22d April.

Motion refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The time when the writ of error issued from the office of the prothonotary of the Supreme Court is immaterial, because it has no effect till delivered to the prothonotary of the Common Pleas; therefore, there is no weight in the first objection. As to the second, the rule is, that you must exclude either, the day of the report being filed, or the day of the writ of error being filed, in the Court below. Consequently, the 20 days allowed for the appeal had elapsed ®n the 22d April.

Motion refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Serg. & Rawle 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frantz-v-kaser-pa-1817.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack