Robinson v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Engineers

90 S.E. 683, 172 N.C. 853, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 426
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 15, 1916·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

This cause was before us on a former appeal, and a full statement of the relevant facts and positions of law involved will bo found in report of said case in 170 N. C., p. 545.

On that appeal a new trial was awarded to defendant, and this opinion having been certified down, the cause was tried before liis Honor, E. B. Cline, judge, and a jury, and plaintiff again recovered.

We have given the present record careful consideration and are of opinion that the case has been tried and the rights of the parties determined in strict accordance with the principles announced in our former decision, and no error has been made to appear.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

No'error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Engineers, 90 S.E. 683, 172 N.C. 853, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 426 (N.C. 1916).

90 S.E. 683 (Robinson v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Engineers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holland v. French
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2020
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. McLean Trucking Co.
78 S.E.2d 159 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Mintz v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
72 S.E.2d 38 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)