Robin C. McDermott v. Thomas Dean Royal

Eighth Circuit

Robin C. McDermott v. Thomas Dean Royal

103 F. App'x 75

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJuly 27, 2004

Docket03-3690

StatusUnpublished

This text of 103 F. App'x 75 (Robin C. McDermott v. Thomas Dean Royal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robin C. McDermott v. Thomas Dean Royal, 103 F. App'x 75 (8th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robin McDermott appeals pro se from a final order entered in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri 1 granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. In her complaint, *76 McDermott alleged that she was denied the rights secured to her by the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution by virtue of the Defendants’ actions in connection with her arrest and subsequent prosecution on charges of obstructing a search and assault of an officer. She asserted a cause of action under § 1983, as well as various pendent state law claims. Having carefully reviewed the record and the applicable legal authorities, we find no error in the district court’s disposition of this matter. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47(B).

1

. The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robin McDermott appeals pro se from a final order entered in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri 1 granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. In her complaint, *76 McDermott alleged that she was denied the rights secured to her by the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution by virtue of the Defendants’ actions in connection with her arrest and subsequent prosecution on charges of obstructing a search and assault of an officer. She asserted a cause of action under § 1983, as well as various pendent state law claims. Having carefully reviewed the record and the applicable legal authorities, we find no error in the district court’s disposition of this matter. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47(B).

1

. The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 F. App'x 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robin-c-mcdermott-v-thomas-dean-royal-ca8-2004.