Robertson v. United States
This text of 111 F.2d 1018 (Robertson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause came on to be heard upon the transcript, briefs, and arguments of counsel; and it appearing that the testimony of an accomplice need not be corroborated to support a conviction [Caminetti v. United States, 242 U.S. 470, 495, 37 S.Ct. 192, 61 L.Ed. 442, L.R.A. 1917F, 502, Ann.Cas.1917B, 1168; Nibbelink v. United States, 6 Cir., 73 F.2d 677, 678; United States v. Muraskin, 2 Cir., 99 F.2d 815], and that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 F.2d 1018, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-united-states-ca6-1940.