Robertson v. Fluerinord

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 27, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-04977·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DALE ROBERTSON, Plaintiff, -against- 23-CV-4977 (JGK} JACQUELINE FLUERINORD; POLICE ORDER OF SERVICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE #1 TO #4; CITY OF NEW YORK; COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, Defendants. JOHN G. KOELTL, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, who is appearing pro se, brings this action under 42 U.S.C, § 1983, alleging claims of false arrest, malicious prosecution, excessive force, and claims arising under state law, By order dated June 14, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees. Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.! Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process... in [IFP] cases.”); Fed, R. Civ. P, 4(c)}(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendants Westchester County, City of New York, and Jacqueline Fluerinord through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to

' Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that summonses be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served the summonses and the complaint until the Court reviewed the compiaint and ordered that the summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the tire to serve until 90 days after the date summonses are issued.

fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return forms (“USM-285 forms”) for these Defendants. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon Defendants. If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summonses are issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service), Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. A. Doe defendants Under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). In the complaint, Plaintiff may supply sufficient information to identify the police officers from the Greenburgh Police Department, the Elmsford Police Department, and the 47th Precinct in the Bronx, who were involved in Plaintiff’s arrest on or around September 7, 2020, and subsequent related events.” It is therefore ordered that the New York City Law Department; the Town of Greenburgh Town Attorney; and the Village of Elmsford, Village Counsel, which are the attorneys for and agents of the New York City Police Department, the Greenburgh Police Department, and the Elmsford Police Department respectively, must ascertain the identity and badge number of each John Doe police officer whom Plaintiff seeks to sue here and the address where the defendants

? It is not clear which officers arrested Plaintiff.

may be served. Those entities must provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court within sixty days of the date of this order. Within thirty days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint naming the John Doe defendants. The amended complaint will replace, not supplement, the original complaint. An amended complaint form that Plaintiff should complete is attached to thts order. Once Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, the Court will screen the amended complaint and, if necessary, issue an order directing the Clerk of Court to complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for the named John Doe Defendants and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk of Court is instructed to: (1) issue summonses for Westchester County, the City of New York, and Jacqueline Fluerinord, complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for these defendants, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service; (2) mail a copy of this order to: (a) the New York City Law Department, at 100 Church Street, New York, N.Y. 10007; (b) the Town Attorney, Town of Greenburgh, 177 Hillside Avenue, Greenburgh, New York 10607; and (c) Village Counsel, the Village of Elmsford, 11 Martine Avenue, White Plains, NY 10606; and (3) mail an information package to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. pace New Yor New York Ph Ly oc, 7A 0/23 ( + JOHN G. KOELTL ~ United States District Judge

DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES

1, Jacqueline Fluerinord 11 Beaufort Street White Plains, N.Y. 10601 2, New York City Law Department 100 Church Street New York, N.Y. 10011 3. Westchester County Westchester County Attorney’s Office 148 Martine Avenue White Plains, New York 10601

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Write the full name of each plaintiff. CV {Include case number if one has been assigned} -against- AMENDED COMPLAINT Do you want a jury terial? OlYes CINo

Write the full name of each defendant. If you need more space, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section il,

NOTICE The public can access electronic court files. For privacy and security reasons, papers filed with the court should therefore not contain: an individual’s full social security number or full birth date; the full name of a person known to be a minor; or a complete financial account number. A filing may include on/ly: the last four digits of a social security number; the year of an individual’s birth; a minor’s initials; and the last four digits of a financial account number. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2.

Rev. 1/9/17

I BASIS FOR JURISDICTION Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction (limited power). Generally, only two types of cases can be heard in federal court: cases involving a federal question and cases involving diversity of citizenship of the parties. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, a case arising under the United States Constitution or federal laws or treaties is a federal question case. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, a case in which a citizen of one State sues a citizen of another State or nation, and the amount in controversy is more than $75,000, is a diversity case. In a diversity case, no defendant may be a citizen of the same State as any plaintiff. What is the basis for federal-court jurisdiction in your case? L] Federal Question Diversity of Citizenship A. If you checked Federal Question Which of your federal constitutional or federal statutory rights have been violated?

B. If you checked Diversity of Citizenship 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robertson v. Fluerinord, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Robertson v. Fluerinord (Robertson v. Fluerinord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meilleur v. Strong
682 F.3d 56 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Walker v. Schult
717 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2013)