Robertson v. Cain

17 So. 3d 960, 2009 La. LEXIS 2489
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robertson v. Cain. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 So. 3d 960
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 4, 2009·No. No. 2008-KP-1116·Published

Opinion

In re Robertson, Allen Jr.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 1-91-611.

Granted in part; otherwise denied. The district court’s judgment denying relator’s claim that he is mentally retarded and so exempt from capital punishment, see Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), is reversed. This case is remanded to the district court for purposes of conducting an evidentiary hearing at which relator will have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that he is mentally retarded and thus may not be executed. See State v. Dunn, 07-0878 (La.1/25/08), 974 So.2d 658. In all other respects, the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robertson v. Cain, 17 So. 3d 960, 2009 La. LEXIS 2489 (La. 2009).

17 So. 3d 960 (Robertson v. Cain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atkins v. Virginia
536 U.S. 304 (Supreme Court, 2002)
State v. Dunn
974 So. 2d 658 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2008)