Robertson v. Cain
This text of 17 So. 3d 960 (Robertson v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Robertson, Allen Jr.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 1-91-611.
Granted in part; otherwise denied. The district court’s judgment denying relator’s claim that he is mentally retarded and so exempt from capital punishment, see Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), is reversed. This case is remanded to the district court for purposes of conducting an evidentiary hearing at which relator will have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that he is mentally retarded and thus may not be executed. See State v. Dunn, 07-0878 (La.1/25/08), 974 So.2d 658. In all other respects, the application is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 So. 3d 960, 2009 La. LEXIS 2489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-cain-la-2009.