Roberts v. United States

752 A.2d 583, 2000 D.C. App. LEXIS 196, 2000 WL 758163
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 1, 2000·No. 96-CF-1092·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

Before STEADMAN, SCHWELB, and RUIZ, Associate Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

In consideration of the opinion by the court in Roberts v. United States, 743 A.2d 212 (D.C.1999) (Roberts I), the appellant’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, the appellee’s opposition to the petition, and the record herein, it is now hereby

ORDERED by the merits division that the petition for rehearing is granted in part and that the opinion in Roberts I is modified as reflected in the division opinion on rehearing issued this date (Roberts II); and the petition for rehearing, in all other respects, is denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied, without prejudice to the filing of a new petition addressed to the division’s decision on rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. United States, 752 A.2d 583, 2000 D.C. App. LEXIS 196, 2000 WL 758163 (D.C. 2000).

752 A.2d 583 (Roberts v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Silva
794 F.3d 173 (First Circuit, 2015)
Darweshi McRoy v. United States
106 A.3d 1051 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2015)
Hooker v. United States
70 A.3d 1197 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)
Lazo v. United States
54 A.3d 1221 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2012)
Marshall v. United States
15 A.3d 699 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)
Olafisoye v. United States
857 A.2d 1078 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2004)
Pearsall v. United States
812 A.2d 953 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
Roberts v. United States
752 A.2d 583 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2000)