Roberts v. State

185 So. 3d 542, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 362, 2016 WL 104343
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 8, 2016
DocketNo. 1D15-1674
StatusPublished

This text of 185 So. 3d 542 (Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. State, 185 So. 3d 542, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 362, 2016 WL 104343 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is GRANTED only upon the basis of the petitioner’s first argument, that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise ¡the issue that no pre-sentence investigation (“PSI”) was completed prior to.the petitioner’s sentencing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(a); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(2)(A)(ii)d; Hernandez v. State, 137 So.3d 542, 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). Accordingly, the sentence imposed by the trial court is hereby VACATED, and this matter is remanded for resentenc-ing following the completion of a PSI. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.710(a).

PETITION GRANTED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hernandez v. State
137 So. 3d 542 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 So. 3d 542, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 362, 2016 WL 104343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.