Roberts v. State

153 So. 3d 961, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20414, 2014 WL 7156865
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roberts v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20102
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 17, 2014·No. No. 3D14-1891·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Todrick Roberts has filed numerous pro se motions and appeals challenging his conviction and sentence after which this Court ordered him, on October 29, 2014, to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings in this Court related to his conviction and sentence imposed in case number F97-4142.1 Upon consideration of Roberts’ response to the order to show cause, we conclude that Roberts failed to demonstrate good cause for his actions. It is therefore ordered that the Clerk of the Third District Court of Appeal shall refuse to accept any further filings that relate to case number F97-4142, unless they have been reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a licensed member of the Florida Bar in good standing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. State, 153 So. 3d 961, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20414, 2014 WL 7156865 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

153 So. 3d 961 (Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. State
149 So. 3d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)