Roberts v. State

764 So. 2d 620, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 315, 2000 WL 36278
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 19, 2000
DocketNo. 99-0058
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 764 So. 2d 620 (Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. State, 764 So. 2d 620, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 315, 2000 WL 36278 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rollinson v. State, 743 So.2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Simmons v. State, 755 So.2d 682 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We certify the same question certified in Simmons as one of great public importance:

Does the Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act, codified as section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (1997), violate the separation of powers clause of the Florida Constitution?
STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murry v. State
766 So. 2d 333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 So. 2d 620, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 315, 2000 WL 36278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.