Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Murry v. State

Murry v. State

766 So. 2d 333, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5282, 2000 WL 526527
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 3, 2000
DocketNo. 4D99-0742
StatusPublished

This text of 766 So. 2d 333 (Murry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murry v. State, 766 So. 2d 333, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5282, 2000 WL 526527 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

In response to appellant’s March 29, 2000, motion for certification, we certify the same question certified in Roberts v. State, 764 So.2d 620 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); McDowell v. State, 764 So.2d 619 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); and Simmons v. State, 755 So.2d 682 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), as one of great public importance:

DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

DELL, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDowell v. State
764 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Simmons v. State
755 So. 2d 682 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Roberts v. State
764 So. 2d 620 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
766 So. 2d 333, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5282, 2000 WL 526527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murry-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.