Roberts v. State

644 So. 2d 332, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10369, 1994 WL 583287
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roberts v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 611 So. 2d 58
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 1994·No. No. 93-01601·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Felicia Roberts appeals her judgment and sentence for second-degree murder which [333]*333was imposed upon remand from this court. We affirm the judgment and sentence. However, the trial court erroneously imposed mandatory court costs of $280 without citation to statutory authority supporting the assessment. See Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We, therefore, strike the assessment of court costs and remand this case to the trial court. The state may seek to reimpose these costs consistent with the holding in Sutton.

The matter is remanded to the trial court for an opportunity to address these costs if the state seeks to do so.

RYDER, A.C.J., and PARKER and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. State, 644 So. 2d 332, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10369, 1994 WL 583287 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

644 So. 2d 332 (Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sutton v. State
635 So. 2d 1032 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)