Roberts v. State

593 So. 2d 323, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1366, 1992 WL 26469
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 1992·No. No. 91-62·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Jones v. State, 477 So.2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (defendant not entitled to hearing when state supplied all information in its possession). See also Freeman v. State, 494 So.2d 270, 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (absent discovery violation, hearing not required), receded from on other grounds, Harris v. State, 544 So.2d 322 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. State, 593 So. 2d 323, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1366, 1992 WL 26469 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

593 So. 2d 323 (Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gonzalez v. State
855 So. 2d 720 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)