Roberts v. State

287 So. 2d 123, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6143
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 28, 1973·No. No. 72-503·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, convicted of second degree murder, brought a timely appeal. Thereafter, he obtained a court order authorizing the reporter to furnish a certified copy of the reporter’s notes of the trial proceedings. In due course it developed that the reporter was not available and it was impossible to obtain a transcript of the trial. Upon motion filed by appellant, the court [124]*124held a hearing for the purpose of attempting to reconstruct a record of the trial proceedings. As a consequence of that hearing, the court entered its order of June 18, 1973 finding in substance that a. record could not be reconstructed and recommending that this court grant the appellant a new trial.

Upon authority of Yancey v. State, Fla.App.1972, 267 So.2d 836, we reverse the judgment appealed and direct that appellant be granted a new trial.

OWEN, C. J., DOWNEY, J., and JOHNSON, CLARENCE T., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. State, 287 So. 2d 123, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6143 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

287 So. 2d 123 (Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. State
347 So. 2d 1033 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)