Roberts v. State
279 So. 2d 373, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8002
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roberts v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 268 So. 2d 578 →
Opinion
We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs filed by counsel. Upon our consideration thereof, appellant having failed to file his pro se brief within the time previously allowed by this Court, we conclude that no reversible error has been demonstrated in the proceedings below. The judgment and sentence of the lower court is accordingly affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberts v. State, 279 So. 2d 373, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8002 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).
279 So. 2d 373 (Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.