Roberts v. State

169 So. 2d 43
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 25, 1964·No. No. 4893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Elester S. Roberts appeals an adverse order entered in proceedings instituted under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S. A. ch. 924 Appendix. The motion for post conviction relief did not allege any matters for which such relief could be granted. See and compare Stacey v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 165 So.2d 222; Dias v. State, Fla.App. 1963, 158 So.2d 766; Savage v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 566; Auflick v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 767; King v. State, Fla.App.1963, 157 So.2d 440.

Affirmed.

SMITH, C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. State, 169 So. 2d 43 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

169 So. 2d 43 (Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beagle v. Bagwell
169 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)