Roberts v. PLS Check Cashers
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IAZMINELROBERTS, SSS
Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 4032 (LTS) JUDGMENT PLS CHECK CASHERS, et al, Defendants. wee KX It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated October 21, 2024, the Court dismisses this action for the reasons set forth in the order. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(b)(ii), 1367(c)(3). The Court also certifies, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Dated: New York, New York October 22, 2024
DANIEL ORTIZ Acting Clerk of Court BY:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberts v. PLS Check Cashers (Roberts v. PLS Check Cashers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.