Roberts v. Greensboro-Fayetteville Bus Co.

153 S.E. 398, 198 N.C. 779, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 483
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 6, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 153 S.E. 398 (Roberts v. Greensboro-Fayetteville Bus Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Greensboro-Fayetteville Bus Co., 153 S.E. 398, 198 N.C. 779, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 483 (N.C. 1930).

Opinion

Stacy, O. J.,

after stating the case: The order striking the defendants’ purported statement of case on appeal from the file of the papers in the cause is supported by the decision in Hicks v. Westbrook, 121 N. C., 131, 28 S. E., 188. This, however, did not entitle the plaintiff to a dismissal of the appeal. Wallace v. Salisbury, 147 N. C., 58, 60 S. E., 713. Non constat, an examination of the defendants’ purported statement of case on appeal, filed here with application for certiorari, fails to convince us that, on the defendants’ own showing, reversible error was committed on the trial of the cause. Hence, it further appearing that no error exists on the face of the record proper, the judgment will be affirmed. McNeill v. R. R., 117 N. C., 642, 23 S. E., 268. It would seem, therefore, that, irrespective of the procedural questions raised by the appeal, the same result would have followed, had the case been presented without them.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Floor MacHine Co. v. Dixon
133 S.E.2d 659 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Little v. Sheets
80 S.E.2d 44 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Hanks v. Norfolk & Western R. R.
52 S.E.2d 717 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
Bell v. . Nivens
33 S.E.2d 66 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)
Pike v. . Seymour
24 S.E.2d 263 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)
State v. . Parnell
199 S.E. 601 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Parrish v. . Hartman
193 S.E. 18 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
State v. . Moore
188 S.E. 421 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
Edwards v. . Perry
179 S.E. 892 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Hooker
178 S.E. 75 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
Weaver v. . Hampton
175 S.E. 110 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
McMahan v. Southern Railway Co.
167 S.E. 225 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Pruitt v. . Wood
156 S.E. 126 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Smith v. . Smith
154 S.E. 737 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 S.E. 398, 198 N.C. 779, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-greensboro-fayetteville-bus-co-nc-1930.