Pike v. . Seymour

24 S.E.2d 263, 222 N.C. 606, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 384
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pike v. . Seymour. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 N.C. 42
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 24, 1943·Published

Opinion

Denny, J.

Where the trial court finds the case on appeal was not served within the time fixed or allowed, or service within such time waived, an order directing the appellants’ case on appeal stricken from the files of said cause and the records of the court, is proper. Hicks v. Westbrook, 121 N. C., 131, 28 S. E., 188; Roberts v. Bus Co., 198 N. C., 779, 153 S. E., 398. Motion having been made in this cause to affirm the *607 judgment below, and it appearing that no error exists on the face of the record proper, the judgment is affirmed. McNeill v. R. R., 117 N. C., 642, 22 S. E., 268; Roberts v. Bus Co., supra.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pike v. . Seymour, 24 S.E.2d 263, 222 N.C. 606, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 384 (N.C. 1943).

24 S.E.2d 263 (Pike v. . Seymour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hicks v. . Westbrook
28 S.E. 188 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
McNeill v. Raleigh & Augusta Air Line Railroad
23 S.E. 268 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)
Roberts v. Greensboro-Fayetteville Bus Co.
153 S.E. 398 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)