Pike v. . Seymour

24 S.E.2d 263, 222 N.C. 606, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 384
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 24, 1943
StatusPublished

This text of 24 S.E.2d 263 (Pike v. . Seymour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pike v. . Seymour, 24 S.E.2d 263, 222 N.C. 606, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 384 (N.C. 1943).

Opinion

Denny, J.

Where the trial court finds the case on appeal was not served within the time fixed or allowed, or service within such time waived, an order directing the appellants’ case on appeal stricken from the files of said cause and the records of the court, is proper. Hicks v. Westbrook, 121 N. C., 131, 28 S. E., 188; Roberts v. Bus Co., 198 N. C., 779, 153 S. E., 398. Motion having been made in this cause to affirm the *607 judgment below, and it appearing that no error exists on the face of the record proper, the judgment is affirmed. McNeill v. R. R., 117 N. C., 642, 22 S. E., 268; Roberts v. Bus Co., supra.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hicks v. . Westbrook
28 S.E. 188 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
McNeill v. Raleigh & Augusta Air Line Railroad
23 S.E. 268 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)
Roberts v. Greensboro-Fayetteville Bus Co.
153 S.E. 398 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 S.E.2d 263, 222 N.C. 606, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pike-v-seymour-nc-1943.