Roberts v. Germania Fire Insurance

71 Ga. 478
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 9, 1884·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Jackson, Chief Justice.

The original declaration is for the recovery on a policy renewed, or at least considered as renewed. The amendment is for failing and refusing to renew a policy. The amendment introduces a new cause of action, and was improperly allowed. Code, §34S0. The original action was on a policy renewed, but not in writing, and was therefore demurrable, Code §2794; and there was thus no error in dismissing the action.

The plaintiff may, perhaps, recover on an original suit, like the amendment, under the decision in 43 Ga., 583; but she must begin de novo.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. Germania Fire Insurance, 71 Ga. 478 (Ga. 1884).

71 Ga. 478 (Roberts v. Germania Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rowell v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co.
136 S.E.2d 917 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
The Home Insurance Company v. Thurmond Tanner
220 F.2d 41 (Fifth Circuit, 1955)
Heisley v. Allied American Mutual Fire Insurance
30 S.E.2d 285 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Nowell v. Mayor of Monroe
171 S.E. 136 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Swift & Co. v. Aydlett
192 N.C. 330 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Barron v. Walker
7 S.E. 272 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)