Roberts v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

44 F.2d 168, 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 289, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 3336, 9 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 289
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 11, 1930
Docket5597
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 44 F.2d 168 (Roberts v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 44 F.2d 168, 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 289, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 3336, 9 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 289 (5th Cir. 1930).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition to review a- decision of the Board of Tax Appeals which held petitioner liable for income taxes, during the years 1920 and 1921, on commissions received by him as compensation for services in collecting delinquent state and county taxes. Those services were rendered under contracts which petitioner had with the state tax commissioner of Georgia and boards of commissioners of several counties of Georgia. The contract with the state tax commissioner was authorized by act of the Legislature, Georgia Laws of 1919, page 55; and it will be assumed that the contracts. with the counties were also authorized by that act. Employment under each contract was subject to be terminated on short notice. Petitioner claims that his income was exempt from federal taxation under the Revenue Act of 1926, § 1211 (26 USCA § 1065-b) on the ground that he was an officer or employee of the state and political subdivisions thereof; hut, under the decisions of the Supreme Court in Metcalf v. Mitchell, 269 U. S. 514, 46 S. Ct. 172, 70 L. Ed. 384, and Lucas v. Howard, 280 U. S. 526, 50 S. Ct. 87, 74 L. Ed. 593, he must be held to have been an independent contractor, and not entitled to- claim exemption because of the nature of his services.

The petition for review is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cochran v. Commissioner
135 F.2d 45 (Fifth Circuit, 1943)
Pickett v. United States
100 F.2d 909 (Eighth Circuit, 1938)
Consoer, Older & Quinlan, Inc. v. Commissioner
85 F.2d 461 (Seventh Circuit, 1936)
Buckner v. Commissioner
77 F.2d 297 (Second Circuit, 1935)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Modjeski
75 F.2d 468 (Second Circuit, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 F.2d 168, 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 289, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 3336, 9 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca5-1930.