Robert Willoughby v. Madison Correctional Institute/Division etc.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 3, 2018
Docket17-2602
StatusPublished

This text of Robert Willoughby v. Madison Correctional Institute/Division etc. (Robert Willoughby v. Madison Correctional Institute/Division etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Willoughby v. Madison Correctional Institute/Division etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-2602 _____________________________

ROBERT WILLOUGHBY,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.

MADISON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE/DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT,

Appellees/Cross-Appellants. _____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. John J. Lazzara, Judge.

Date of Accident: November 24, 2014.

May 3, 2018

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant appeals, and the Employer/Carrier (E/C) cross-appeals, an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) declining, in part, to approve a stipulated E/C-paid attorney’s fee, approving a reduced fee amount, and ordering that the balance of the monies be remitted to Claimant personally. The JCC’s ruling was based on his findings of fact regarding the reasonableness of the attorney’s fee. The record before us does not support those findings. Therefore, just as in the recently published Gomez v. Frank Crum, Inc., 228 So. 3d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017), and Banegas v. ACR Environmental, Inc., 228 So. 3d 734 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017), we find reversible error.

Accordingly, we REVERSE the portion of the order reducing the agreed upon attorney’s fee, as well as the portion of the order reforming the stipulation, and REMAND for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WOLF, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Mark L. Zientz of Law Offices of Mark L. Zientz, P.A., for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Hinda Klein of Conroy Simberg, Hollywood, for Appellees/Cross- Appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yeimis Banegas v. ACR Environmental, inc and Berkley etc.
228 So. 3d 734 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Leonardo Ernesto Gomez v. Frank Crum, Inc. and Broadspire
228 So. 3d 735 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert Willoughby v. Madison Correctional Institute/Division etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-willoughby-v-madison-correctional-institutedivision-etc-fladistctapp-2018.