Robert Willoughby v. Madison Correctional Institute/Division etc.
This text of Robert Willoughby v. Madison Correctional Institute/Division etc. (Robert Willoughby v. Madison Correctional Institute/Division etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D17-2602 _____________________________
ROBERT WILLOUGHBY,
Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
MADISON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE/DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT,
Appellees/Cross-Appellants. _____________________________
On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. John J. Lazzara, Judge.
Date of Accident: November 24, 2014.
May 3, 2018
PER CURIAM.
In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant appeals, and the Employer/Carrier (E/C) cross-appeals, an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) declining, in part, to approve a stipulated E/C-paid attorney’s fee, approving a reduced fee amount, and ordering that the balance of the monies be remitted to Claimant personally. The JCC’s ruling was based on his findings of fact regarding the reasonableness of the attorney’s fee. The record before us does not support those findings. Therefore, just as in the recently published Gomez v. Frank Crum, Inc., 228 So. 3d 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017), and Banegas v. ACR Environmental, Inc., 228 So. 3d 734 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017), we find reversible error.
Accordingly, we REVERSE the portion of the order reducing the agreed upon attorney’s fee, as well as the portion of the order reforming the stipulation, and REMAND for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
WOLF, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Mark L. Zientz of Law Offices of Mark L. Zientz, P.A., for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Hinda Klein of Conroy Simberg, Hollywood, for Appellees/Cross- Appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Willoughby v. Madison Correctional Institute/Division etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-willoughby-v-madison-correctional-institutedivision-etc-fladistctapp-2018.