Robert Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference
This text of 202 F.2d 312 (Robert Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The urgency of a speedy determination of' this controversy is recognized by all parties concerned and accounts for the immediate hearing and consideration of the case by this court.
It is the conclusion of the majority that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed. Their views are in substantial accord with those of Chief Judge Laws of the District Court set forth in his opinion, 104 F.Supp. 734.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 F.2d 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-ramspeck-v-federal-trial-examiners-conference-cadc-1952.