Robert Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference
202 F.2d 312
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 20, 1952·No. 11421_1·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinions
The urgency of a speedy determination of' this controversy is recognized by all parties concerned and accounts for the immediate hearing and consideration of the case by this court.
It is the conclusion of the majority that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed. Their views are in substantial accord with those of Chief Judge Laws of the District Court set forth in his opinion, 104 F.Supp. 734.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robert Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference, 202 F.2d 312 (D.C. Cir. 1952).
202 F.2d 312 (Robert Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Gold
470 F. Supp. 1336 (N.D. Illinois, 1979)
Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference
345 U.S. 128 (Supreme Court, 1953)
Robert Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference
202 F.2d 312 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)