Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III
This text of Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III (Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-13-00554-CV Style: Robert Pearson v. Roger Kroschel, III, Individually and as the Representative of Rockin’ R Trucking Date motion filed*: April 11, 2014 Type of motion: Motion to extend time for filing appellee/cross-appellant’s brief Party filing motion: Appellee/Cross-Appellant Document to be filed: Cross-Appellant’s Brief
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: April 1, 2014 Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested: June 11, 2014
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: June 11, 2014 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances. Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________
Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp Acting for the Court
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: April 22, 2014
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-peterson-v-roger-kroschel-iii-texapp-2014.