Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-13-00554-CV Style: Robert Pearson v. Roger Kroschel, III, Individually and as the Representative of Rockin’ R Trucking Date motion filed*: April 11, 2014 Type of motion: Motion to extend time for filing appellee/cross-appellant’s brief Party filing motion: Appellee/Cross-Appellant Document to be filed: Cross-Appellant’s Brief
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: April 1, 2014 Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested: June 11, 2014
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: June 11, 2014 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances. Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________
Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp Acting for the Court
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: April 22, 2014
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III (Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.