Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 22, 2014·No. 01-13-00554-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-00554-CV Style: Robert Pearson v. Roger Kroschel, III, Individually and as the Representative of Rockin’ R Trucking Date motion filed*: April 11, 2014 Type of motion: Motion to extend time for filing appellee/cross-appellant’s brief Party filing motion: Appellee/Cross-Appellant Document to be filed: Cross-Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: April 1, 2014 Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested: June 11, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due: June 11, 2014  The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: April 22, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III (Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.