Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 10, 2013·No. 01-13-00554-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-00554-CV Style: Robert Pearson v. Roger Kroschel, III, Individually and as Representative of Rockin’ R Trucking Date motion filed*: November 19, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to extend time to file the reporter’s record and evidence Party filing motion: Appellee Document to be filed: Reporter’s record

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: October 1, 2013 Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested: February 18, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ On October 21, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified the parties that a reporter’s record had not been filed. If additional time is necessary, the Court may extend the deadline to file the reporter’s record if the court reporter requests. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3.(c). The court reporter has filed a request for an extension. Accordingly, we dismiss appellee’s motion.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: December 10, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III (Robert Peterson v. Roger Kroschel, III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.