Robert Norton v. Camtu Phan

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 24, 2021
Docket03-21-00603-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Robert Norton v. Camtu Phan (Robert Norton v. Camtu Phan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Norton v. Camtu Phan, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00603-CV

Robert Norton, Appellant

v.

Camtu Phan, Appellee

FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 20-1075-C368, THE HONORABLE RICK J. KENNON, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellant Robert Norton has filed an emergency motion for temporary relief in this

interlocutory appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 29.3. To preserve the status quo of the appeal while the

Court considers the motion for temporary relief, the trial court’s November 19, 2021 order granting

a temporary injunction is stayed in part, pending further order of this Court. The Court stays the

portion of the temporary injunction prohibiting Norton “from entering, occupying, or utilizing

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Camtu Phan’s real property located at 3847 Laurel Ridge Drive

Round Rock, TX 78665, and from interfering with Plaintiff’s use and enjoyment of same” starting

at 4:01 p.m. on Saturday, November 27, 2021, as well as the portion ordering “that the Williamson

County Constable shall appear at 3847 Laurel Ridge Drive Round Rock, TX 78665 at 4:00 p.m.

on November 27, 2021 to keep the peace while any remaining personal property is removed from

the residence and the locks are changed.” The Court orders both parties to file briefing with the Court on or before

December 6, 2021, to inform the Court why supersedeas or another order made under Texas Rule

of Appellate Procedure 24 would not adequately protect the parties’ rights during the pendency of

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 29.3 (prohibiting appellate court from suspending trial court’s

order if supersedeas would adequately protect parties); see also id. R. 29.2 (“The trial court may

permit an order granting interlocutory relief to be superseded pending an appeal from the order, in

which event the appellant may supersede the order in accordance with Rule 24.”).

It is ordered on November 24, 2021.

Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Smith

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert Norton v. Camtu Phan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-norton-v-camtu-phan-texapp-2021.