Robert Martinez v. State
Opinion
r^rrti £Wf of Appeal
$*" Av^ 7^ 78205" loo 'Pb(crcs<^. <5^V Aa/^). 7* 7g 2^> 5* |4n^ of Appw -frcr* Orger daw «
Court vj App^k do- QH-iy-tio^^fZ faiK&r Ccrm-L Cfurf- Art U/W AJ*, 5" '^chert^nn^r-^A/ez, pn> Se. TOc^s ,p Mo. /f3/3?7
x,.k .. r r- n, — V(A Ob. FrRSr cuk>5 £t)(nburc{'7*~ J' ^ 781^25 17" en .' *1
fV^ CO -I!..::
: :
PLEASE AU_flw/ TMiS TO $£^^/€ AS NOV&t §f= h&WEKL. F^OW ORPep; \>CT££ Wed/TYkrck 4-, 2-015" "To WiT J
t\\ Salens Sfre^f 5u*rV 3co
f\f>pe\WwV foe* ntrf Wu/e. a ri^M" -fe Wvbn^ re^€5 ervVfvcy\ Acpp^lU^TS pro-se meliM 15 DEFIED,
"X (\m ^ (J^lec) 5-Kw3 U-fi^eTi 0+ lUGiqe^T &W|u3 i/M^fa/e -p Kvfe coonseil or rNy cKoosm&.
Oo ftc. I3,zcft, X K^mffar'AppelUict" ftjj ^ ChjW Wnf o4 fttb«5 C\rpo5 porso^ U /WM« 11-072- of the
W\ \* -foe firsV o^c,Xl N*ta ,-M-\/*U ih« Caur-b ^pp€.\lA^f ha5 iKf (ocso ^fk. rep**4^ly re<^->f ^ be gu/e/O NtoW »f v^por-K^ ^^SQsiwx be(Vi^ m^e f>j fa'?> case -tfie (Wis W* r^My Ueh \t ju* ^ , (/J vuMUy,
NT TW5 WWXAJ4 M>PeUAMT ^\AS NOT 6££lU cj)aTACT£D
APF&IIAWT FILES XHI5 MOTICE OF APPEAL AtfP Beue/E5> vie .\Aas
On! Feb 4, 2-01^ APPELLANT {WAS ORpEREP AT 300cC.rn. THAT f\e WAS 6RPe(2_B^ to cjXJRX APPELLA/OT WAS K-or ^ue^ Motice-of- H-€Aai/v)& £F FebM-.zoiq- (He t-^^u- PRes^DiMG Tosse dASaJ RH'maa)'
U&f briYUj Kis stemc -«ye 4^S?5, AppellA<4-• m*k Akffct ft £le oi\ caoyvV \»J £<4 *rf 4fb -iW.i^e. Uck A**) «jj«ud (e^iie^Ud -Hva4- Kmw ir
<^pJ* vJl{l ^ 4U- rW'i/^ X>
4"W*4 X ^ *M r*^ ^ ~rv ^c^tfr". T believe -4W- hkJeeJ ",-£ 3- ^*' yelk) vAi ^M l\KAUiJ*r 3 ^r^o W?
X\ T5 cU«-r J^^IUaa r\AS vJ&rlUd As kfS
KUa4vM5, pe^U*iY) M^V^^ p^Ji-4wK3y flCLp^KS $.{e} £r~
biiecte. kc "^ ejJ^Tl-eo -ft Hta Ire It ^-t U Sezks • -the [jpvv. Cfton 5£c4^ vjk^r is tJuSrf. • ,'• A/ud Ml OP-DefL . A^ptHA^- WlreJ5 -fU &M)eP- 'is r\-Vs 3^ETe<\i^v. ( ApppelUA' ^kwec) T^ T^* £W4 of 6u«r 0") &yv« ye^r ^^o. -Vta (iW-U r^W? fJbfte oft*f- j^jOcrs £6o!cl m 5 be CL^^f^SS^J A<^o rc)(eJ Opov\. ^ppalUivA- Has bflg^ appi/vW C^i^vSel NlJ <^ C2-) "M A.ppwiO'ta) ^uTtsel5 i\V2- cm\^cM ^p^d[/ctJ\, "TUaz_ Wbr SeffW5 4VW5 d«.(Yu5 -tl^ef Vvur^l: Iqjl \^du6*c) A/t/J fi\As ovbik Upw ta. f^ua. .^W- uJ ^ppLilA;Arf ;ffcO $^nd Arv^^J Ap|)lrcarf-^v w&-5 (Ux M«J <\Ka4 /q?plU*x ui&s /Ox CTv Cm.^^v-i Mp&vJliu^ Cw4 tuU) "iJ^ rie dart's afB*. vc***& -tKY <4le ^.AJ^eicrjpe <4ta O.S %e^sf^[ pytfu[ fvU^t SySf^ JeljeJ>rt. 5bck • p^n^. /Vpp^U<^4 kf.s Mock ftr kh f^fr\5 A 7 AM iftwk pH;4 s*f 4U. V^- <-^n J . 4* (W v/jat^ k^ *,y^u kx ilT/UJ *f (u-5 Wn^ 4VW5 arpu5 .Ex ^ixc^^Tj ^ bsfk. C«rvveL Ua4 Mr Lax) MS" wii^rmsztiuxs -rt* f*un\ VJill SW^ ^ rep^J Ni]f ^^ ^.|^ +*"* ^ ^ ^ iu_kt ^ ^ ^ Anpp-tUwJr &( f<2ce^ sJo nu-fta) ^^sLv^^f |)^ca,5. a^ CakiM Vyva(^ sure ulrW- ^ ^y_ -p \Aii)e^d -\W (W-b kAvie reamed ^ock 6r dm^ofed \M> \Hit p6Y4rAW (bow /TYHcp. Ai:4 lt^L4?0 aJ ^5 Afri"k**ta -Qc^ 4U Oovfe g> 4W felted J\^ $e^5. ^pjflellAAn Ofays H^^ > V2^ Tfttoitk ^ (51 ^cdriiz. Lsyaei- <^4icfc Jiu( tffdxUd Qfovdy (*-M5, Oed^ft U/ul
pM*> ^'V^ lA^a f6s-fe^ p^ pc,-y J C/l^ \U Those L iqS J 1 t HJi he t£& >°oa °^S.>< O/7/i ^00 w"'7^ ^j^?^ *fr»ft ** £- rK -i CD M n W ® n Q ^ 2 .o> S3 NIX Wlfi-nji Q-6fS
I *>Cj
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robert Martinez v. State (Robert Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.