Robert Martinez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 5, 2015
Docket04-14-00555-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Robert Martinez v. State (Robert Martinez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Martinez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

fha&ks* IlM

U

: '

m --L

u&

4k e- we -~ "■•-' °

fVir.

-nn3 C&rhtieu Copies of

your

Wrif of

1^* il * ^**'

Coan-L

Cour*f

% of available U mi ,«*> G**o KbVl ce.

b GuMW Wp'lW 0l55l6tiwa \o

a r UJnf o-f 110*72, of

Ov/e k (j rvu/vv~tHs

rf 4 '■■>

o l ' ''7 y

C,'nrru.. !

r !i <;»-

^AiiUVs O^d

4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, hereby certify that on this the %l day of £6/4 a true and

correct copy of the above and foregoing _± ?** •was

transmitted to Bexar County District Attorney, Criminal Justice Center,

101 W.Nueva, San Antonio, Texas 78205, v^'*-« -. ■ - ' , ^.&1W ■ ^ , • ■

«^J Anv^Tr -?&2-b>/ r^o^ ^^^ D'( ^^'-/ x^oj^/*vi ,.>,;!: ^^.

Defendant,

ORDER

On this the of , came on to be heard

Defendant's said motion is hereby

( ) GRANTED ( ) DENIED

Signed this of

Judge Presiding PETITIONER'S INFORMATION

Petitioner's printed name:

State bar number, if applicable:

Address:

Telephone:,

Fax:

INMATE'S DECLARATION

am the applicant / petitioner (circle one) and

perjury that, according to my belief, the fects stated in the above application are true and correct

Signature of Applicant / Petitioner (circle one) &:ACX 5»0 Ai

17 her S& 7(2-5

CcotL-r AT

of

072-

s Aypfic* -fun, fr bJnf rf

l cut3

■■•"V. pns«m

on-Me /3^ cky of Ouc&ntlMr' gofy ofeein -died porsuartf ~k

iJ6S ardn-fcj ^e^t

f/ l l £J ofapp/tcdnts 4t/a(',£cccrtcm under

tud i^uo^H-kiru. Trice/ J

pro(o*4urt (o*4urt ^^ ^n-kc) 5^ and M p p -far ajni of fplxos Co/ 4o Mtclt 11611- H

J hk, /Wile- in* -ft"*/ fitJdtn^ e-f jii' j 710 jOdymen-t id itl/i C**Jse- , anjplexaJ on probxfu* & a fltnJ

e. b.f '7 J?"""

-fr

m

-thai* tin gu'lry fa ujs

of fill ku) t* *th«t he, ntftfined

thf auilhf "Triti fTtvnse/ relied cm eyt*>&f '7 \J f - h ^ ** '"*

C*tT* L/lc

*<

v of

a

r^u L«uj Cy ***** *

at 4tM*< tmfa I J

k Ai (l "//t/^ -fa fa f»/l-£ f/l£r order -fa $* pAp*r's> u/nh Sfe will awf-wi/e -jt urjz

A*

d>) t // lh of

(a> A f

0)

ls is re<)

un der -/Art ch<,pkr.

piyjt>fS -r*"

7 ~S) T(\o.r\\ utz TVeswrfly J^f-f

my

o-f

op 2^14 ,..,,) ,..,, ,i -ft, -f

ko \\.0^7- 6^ -fk

bi

^jW^ lot \rj. '[■'". ;.'.i'*-,;'.1"!-''*'•■■ -.53 Mi -5

,;>:/i*.

C 8

2 Q O o-

r1 rn

CO

N it ;-. o

-Ui 1

X I

O o o : ■ CD i O IO

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert Martinez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-martinez-v-state-texapp-2015.