Robert Martinez v. State
This text of Robert Martinez v. State (Robert Martinez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
fha&ks* IlM
U
: '
m --L
u&
4k e- we -~ "■•-' °
fVir.
-nn3 C&rhtieu Copies of
your
Wrif of
1^* il * ^**'
Coan-L
Cour*f
% of available U mi ,«*> G**o KbVl ce.
b GuMW Wp'lW 0l55l6tiwa \o
a
Ov/e k (j rvu/vv~tHs
rf 4 '■■>
o l ' ''7 y
C,'nrru.. !
r !i <;»-
^AiiUVs O^d
4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, hereby certify that on this the %l day of £6/4 a true and
correct copy of the above and foregoing _± ?** •was
transmitted to Bexar County District Attorney, Criminal Justice Center,
101 W.Nueva, San Antonio, Texas 78205, v^'*-« -. ■ - ' , ^.&1W ■ ^ , • ■
«^J Anv^Tr -?&2-b>/ r^o^ ^^^ D'( ^^'-/ x^oj^/*vi ,.>,;!: ^^.
Defendant,
ORDER
On this the of , came on to be heard
Defendant's said motion is hereby
( ) GRANTED ( ) DENIED
Signed this of
Judge Presiding PETITIONER'S INFORMATION
Petitioner's printed name:
State bar number, if applicable:
Address:
Telephone:,
Fax:
INMATE'S DECLARATION
am the applicant / petitioner (circle one) and
perjury that, according to my belief, the fects stated in the above application are true and correct
Signature of Applicant / Petitioner (circle one) &:ACX 5»0 Ai
17 her S& 7(2-5
CcotL-r AT
of
072-
s Aypfic* -fun, fr bJnf rf
l cut3
■■•"V. pns«m
on-Me /3^ cky of Ouc&ntlMr' gofy ofeein -died porsuartf ~k
iJ6S ardn-fcj ^e^t5e fort or *\ info 6L flit/fry fly p/etL /h /An case, fp
f/ l l £J ofapp/tcdnts 4t/a(',£cccrtcm under
tud i^uo^H-kiru. Trice/ J
pro(o*4urt (o*4urt ^^ ^n-kc) 5^ and M p p -far ajni of fplxos Co/ 4o Mtclt 11611- H
J hk, /Wile- in* -ft"*/ fitJdtn^ e-f jii' j 710 jOdymen-t id itl/i C**Jse- , anjplexaJ on probxfu* & a fltnJ e. b.f '7 J?""" -fr m -thai* tin gu'lry fa ujs of fill ku) t* *th«t he, ntftfined thf auilhf "Triti fTtvnse/ relied cm eyt*>&f '7 \J f - h ^ ** '"* C*tT* L/lc *< v of a r^u L«uj Cy ***** * at 4tM*< tmfa I J k Ai (l "//t/^ -fa fa f»/l-£ f/l£r order -fa $* pAp*r's> u/nh Sfe will awf-wi/e -jt urjz A* d>) t // lh of (a> A f 0) ls is re<) un der -/Art ch<,pkr. piyjt>fS -r*" 7 ~S) T(\o.r\\ utz TVeswrfly J^f-f my o-f op 2^14 ,..,,) ,..,, ,i -ft, -f ko \\.0^7- 6^ -fk bi ^jW^ lot \rj. '[■'". ;.'.i'*-,;'.1"!-''*'•■■ -.53 Mi -5 ,;>:/i*. C 8 2 Q O o- r1 rn CO N it ;-. o -Ui 1 O o o : ■ CD i O IOX I
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Martinez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-martinez-v-state-texapp-2015.